005 |
|
20221101145723.0 |
020 |
|
|a0230245269
|
020 |
|
|a9780230245266
|
024 |
7
|
|a10.1057/9780230245266|2doi
|
040 |
|
|aUKPGM|beng|cUKPGM|dNOU
|
049 |
|
|aAPTA
|
050 |
4
|
|aKD8420|b.C75 2009
|
082 |
04
|
|a347.4208|222
|
245 |
04
|
|aThe Criminal Cases Review Commission|h[electronic resource] :|bhope for the innocent? /|cedited by Michael Naughton.
|
260 |
|
|aBasingstoke :|bPalgrave Macmillan,|c2009.
|
300 |
|
|ap. cm.
|
505 |
0
|
|aThe Importance of Innocence for the Criminal Justice System / M.Naughton -- Thoughts from a Victim Support Worker / H.Kierle -- Challengingthe Refusal to Investigate Evidence Neglected by Trial/ A.Green -- The Failure to Live Up to its Stated Values?: The Case of Michael Attwooll and John Roden / D.Eady -- The Failure of the Review of the Possible Wrongful Convictions Caused by Michael Heath / S.Sekar -- Historical Abuse Cases: Why They Expose the Inadequacy of the Real Possibility Test / M.Newby -- Only the Freshest Will Do / C.Malone -- Applicant Solicitors: Friends or Foes? / G.Maddocks & G.Tan -- The Inadequacy of Legal Aid / S.Bird -- After 10 Years: An Investment in Justice? / R.Nobles & D.Schiff -- Real Possibility or Fat Chance? / K.Kerrigan -- Press and Release: UK News Coverage of the CCRC Since 1996 / P.Mason -- The CCRC as an Option for Canada: Forwards or Backwards? / C.Walker & K.Campbell --A View from the United States/ R.Schehr -- Conclusion / M.Naughton.
|
520 |
|
|aThis book focuses on the world's first publicly-funded body to review alleged miscarriages ofjustice, set up in the wake of notorious cases such as the Guildford Four and the Birmingham Six. Bringing together critical perspectives from campaigners, prominent criminal appeal practitioners andacademic specialists, it centres on the different aspects of the CCRC's tasks, in particular, the limitations placed on it by itsgoverning statute that hinder its claimed independence from the appealcourts and its working practices which prevents the referral of cases in which victims may be factually innocent. The book compares the CCRC with existing systems in Scotland, the US and Canada that deal with alleged wrongful convictions. Thoroughly undermining its operations, this study argues thatthe CCRC's help to innocent victims of wrongful conviction is merely incidental.
|
533 |
|
|aElectronic reproduction.|bBasingstoke, England :|cPalgrave Macmillan,|d2010.|nMode of access:World Wide Web.|nSystem requirements: Web browser.|nTitle from title screen (viewed on Apr. 12, 2010).|nAccess may be restricted to users at subscribing institutions.
|
610 |
10
|
|aGreat Britain.|bCriminal Cases Review Commission.
|
650 |
0
|
|aAppellate procedure|zGreat Britain.
|
650 |
0
|
|aJudicial error|zGreat Britain.
|
650 |
0
|
|aJudicial review|zGreat Britain.
|
655 |
7
|
|aElectronic books.|2local
|
700 |
1
|
|aNaughton, Michael.
|
710 |
2
|
|aPalgrave Connect (Online service)
|
776 |
1
|
|cOriginal|z9780230219380|z0230219381|w(OCoLC)429598297
|
809 |
|
|pEB|dKD8420|eC929|y2009
|
856 |
40
|
|3Palgrave Connect|uhttp://www.palgraveconnect.com/doifinder/10.1057/9780230245266|zaccess to fulltext (Palgrave)
|